Colin Cowherd Reveals Shameful Truth About Caitlin Clark Joining Team USA | HO

Colin Cowherd discusses the controversy around Caitlin Clark’s exclusion from the original Olympic roster and the possibility of her replacing Taurasi. Many see her as a superstar, but others argue that she lacks the experience needed for the Olympics. Despite her exceptional performance and impact on the sport, the Olympic committee and the WNBA appear to downplay her significance.

However, considering her record-breaking TV ratings and influence, her absence seems perplexing and potentially influenced by an anti-Caitlin sentiment in the league. Adding her to the team could enhance the game’s popularity, especially since the US women’s team dominates international competitions, making Caitlin’s inclusion a logical choice.

Colin Cowherd validates the anti-Caitlin Clark sentiment regarding the Olympic Committee and her snub from Team USA. The omission of Caitlin Clark from the initial roster left many baffled, given her immense popularity and talent. Some viewed this year’s roster as the women’s equivalent of the NBA’s Dream Team, believing Clark could significantly boost the sport’s global profile. Therefore, her exclusion from the original lineup was perplexing.

However, an opportunity for rectification arose with Diana Taurasi’s injury, potentially opening the door for Clark to join the Olympic team. This situation is somewhat ironic, considering Taurasi’s previous comments suggesting Clark would face a tough reality in the WNBA. Taurasi received backlash for these remarks, with some accusing her of jealousy. However, Clark’s impressive performance against Taurasi, where she nearly achieved a triple-double, led to Taurasi ultimately praising Clark’s game.

Clark’s popularity is undeniable, evidenced by her leading the All-Star Game votes with over 700,000 votes, far surpassing the previous year’s top vote-getter, A’ja Wilson, who had 96,000 votes. Despite this, the WNBA appears unprepared to capitalize on her star power. Clark’s Indiana Fever, the worst team in the league, was given the toughest early schedule, leading to a poor start. The league had to scramble to accommodate Clark and her fans, indicating a lack of foresight.

Moreover, the Olympic Committee’s decision not to include Clark on the team, possibly influenced by Coach Cheryl Reeve’s apparent disfavor, sparked further controversy. Reeve cited Clark’s lack of training camp participation and rookie status as reasons for her exclusion, despite Clark’s record-breaking performances and significant impact on the game.

Clark has already proven her critics wrong, becoming the first WNBA rookie to record a triple-double and setting numerous franchise records. Off the court, her influence is equally significant, driving record-breaking viewership and jersey sales.

The Olympic Committee now has a chance to correct its initial mistake. Including Clark on the team would not only acknowledge her talent but also boost the sport’s popularity and viewership. The women’s Olympic competition is less intense than the men’s, making it an ideal platform to showcase a superstar like Clark.

The argument for Clark’s inclusion is strong: her presence on the team would attract viewers and elevate the sport’s profile. Her impact on television ratings and viewership has been unparalleled, with her games consistently breaking records.

In conclusion, excluding Caitlin Clark from the Olympic roster seems unfathomable. Her contributions to the sport are undeniable, and including her in the team would benefit not only her but the entire women’s basketball community. It is crucial for the committee to recognize her achievements and rectify their previous oversight by ensuring her place on the Olympic team.